At Google, we work tirelessly to provide a safer experience for kids and teens online, and we build our products with this mission in mind. Yesterday, Adalytics released a deeply flawed and uninformed report about how we manage advertising on made for kids content on YouTube, and our privacy policies for people under the age of 18 across our platforms.
This research comes on the heels of a previous inaccurate report by them from earlier this summer about our video partner inventory. It was subsequently debunked by multiple independent third parties, including DoubleVerify, IAS and Pixability.
Despite its length, this new report failed to substantiate claims that we are in violation of government regulations, such as COPPA, or our own policies around ads personalization. The New York Times in their reporting on the study clearly noted, “There is no evidence that Google and YouTube violated their 2019 agreement with the F.T.C.”
So let’s once again set the record straight and remind people of our longstanding approach.
Since January 2020, YouTube has treated personal information from anyone watching “made for kids” content on the platform as coming from a child, regardless of the age of the viewer. This means we prohibit ads personalization. Additionally, we do not allow the use of third-party trackers in advertisements served on made for kids content on YouTube.
This report falsely claims that the presence of cookies indicates a privacy breakdown. The opposite is true, and the report fails to show otherwise.
Whether you’re in the YouTube Kids app, viewing made for kids content on YouTube or signed-in with a supervised account, we have strict policies on the type of ad content that we allow. While we allow advertising to support creators who make high-quality content for kids, these guidelines limit the types of products and services that can run next to their content. For example, we restrict ads for things like dating apps and food and beverage products, as well as ads with violent or graphic content. These restrictions are similar to what is employed by other industries, like television, who have their own guidelines for ad content that runs on kids channels or content.
We have long offered advertisers a one-click option that allows them to opt out of made for kids content on YouTube. This tool works across YouTube and Google, including on Performance Max campaigns. The report completely overlooks this fact, and at times suggests otherwise. We invest heavily in educating advertisers and making these tools simpler, including a recent launch of our new Content Suitability Center, which gives advertisers a single point of entry to control their suitability options and exclusions across Google platforms.
You must be at least 13 years old to use YouTube, or a parent or legal guardian must enable it for you. We offer families a host of options for how to ensure their kids have a safer experience on YouTube. Parents can select YouTube Kids, which was designed specifically to meet the needs of kids. Personalized ads have never been allowed on YouTube Kids. And we have strict advertising guidelines for YouTube Kids which prohibit ads personalization and age-sensitive ad categories, as well as clickable ads or ads that link to external destinations. Parents of tweens can choose Supervised Accounts if they feel their tweens are ready to explore more of YouTube. We also do not serve personalized ads to supervised accounts, and restrict age-sensitive ad categories.
We’ve invested a great deal of time and resources to protect kids on our platforms, especially when it comes to the ads they see – from building kid-specific products like YouTube Kids or supervised accounts, to launching a global restriction on personalized ads and age-sensitive ad categories for all users under 18.
We welcome responsible research around our products, and we always appreciate the opportunity to speak with advertisers, users, regulators and third-party groups about the rules that govern our platform. But not only did Adalytics repeatedly ignore our offers to meet with them, but also their report — either accidentally or intentionally — draws misleading conclusions based on a deeply inaccurate understanding of our privacy practices. While we have serious issues with this report, our first priority remains the same: to continue upholding our industry-leading protections for kids and teens across our products.